Why a board of a huge German company was brought to tears by robot journalism?

supermarktkasse
Cash registers with scanners are great. Especially for getting to grip with the nitty-gritty of a store, company or holding. That’s the theory, at least. Real life is, as always, different. The request for an analysis and reporting tool for the marketing department of a supermarket with more than 2,000 shops was a welcomed change, since we are normally involved in what is called robot journalism. But data are data.

So we started to investigate how our client was currently dealing with the millions of data sent from around 9,000 cash registers across Germany. It became one of the most complicated investigations of my life, even though I had worked for many years as a freelance journalist in the Middle East. That was easy stuff compared with a German supermarket chain.

The data are pretty much coming in in real time” – so far, so good. A clear-cut statement. But it was the only thing to be clear in the next two weeks. There were project teams working on the data, joined by external data analysts, highly paid big data experts, teams composed of university students, guys from marketing, IT, accounting and finance. Then there were the executive assistants, tax consultants, controllers and, of course, the highly important and very expensive consultancies. No one group ever talked about the same data. Instead of being on the same page, everyone was off on their own page. Each interested party, each expert used their own analysis and, of course, the reports to the board, coming in at a delay of two to three weeks, were crap. Did anyone bother to read what the customers themselves were doing in the supermarkets? Probably not. They were busy reading opinions regarding the analysis of opinions on pre-selected data.

We hit the ground running. First, we did the most important thing for the project: we explained to everybody working on the data that we were not the enemy. That we wanted to help everyone work easier and more efficiently by sharing with them the enormous amount of customer experience we had collected. We jettisoned the over-paid consultancies, but then this was something to be expected.

To make a long story short: after four weeks we presented the first analysis based on the daily deluge of data, distributed them to the different levels of management. The marketing board was close to tears when the first top-level summary was delivered directly to their smartphones, 80 lines, easy to read, with the “action required” points leading the way, all at a delay of 40 seconds to real time.

We know it’s still taking too long but we’re working on it.

Ist Roboterjournalismus die Verlängerung des digitalen Journalismus? Ganz aktuelle Analyse der Uni Zürich

Zürich

Dank des Kommunikationswissenschaftlers Konstantin Dörr vom “Institute of Mass Communication and Media Research” an der Universität Zürich gibt es seit heute einen sehr guten und vor allem sehr aktuellen Überblick über das, was “Roboterjournalismus” ist und sein könnte!

In zahlreichen Interviews und Unternehmensbesuchen hat Dörr einen wichtigen Überblick über diese einigermaßen junge Technik des “textcomposing” geschrieben. Und – nach seiner Analyse ist Roboterjournalismus auf jeden Fall eine Bereicherung der Medienwelt:

While digital journalism in general is still primarily text-based and is only
enriched with photographs, videos, and graphics (Quandt 2008, 140), NLG as the core
technology constantly progresses and fulfills the prerequisite of multimediality
. As there
are already NLG systems that include hyperlinks (Reiter 2010, 595), therefore interactivity
as the technological potential to enable consumer interaction is possible (Neuberger
2007, 43). The more customized the final text product, the more effective and usable it
is for the reader or client. This is a major reason for the use of NLG systems in journalism
(Bateman 2010, 635)
“.

Alle internationalen Player werden berücksichtigt, das “Natural Language Processing” hinreichend und doch noch gut verständlich wissenschaftlich erläutert. Dörrs Schluss bestätigt auch textomatic, denn im Gegensatz zu amerikanischen Playern geht es dem Team aus Berlin/Dortmund nicht darum, menschengemachten Journalismus zu ersetzen: “Overall, NLG can be seen as a product extension of digital journalism”.